
I've spent a lot of time in Sandy Hill over the past three years, but as most of you know, I didn't live here until May of 2009. When the Man of Science and I decided to move in together, several people asked me, "Well, why can't he just move in with you?" I looked at them like they were bonkers. A one bedroom rented apartment with no backyard was just no contest for an owned three bedroom house with outdoor space big enough for dogs and a garden, no matter how much I loved Cambridge Street North. I made up mind to happily cohabitate with my partner and our pets in this new neighbourhood.
Sandy Hills charms were not readily obvious, especially because I moved in just as the legions of Ottawa U students were throwing their last hurrah parties before going back to their parents' homes for the summer. Students, for the most part, are unappealing neighbours. They do not have roots in the community and this can lead to a lack of consideration for those of us who live here full time. Plus, on a more personal level, I didn't know anyone in this neighbourhood when I moved here. And I wasn't exactly sure how I was going to meet people. It made me feel kind of cranky and isolated, after coming from a street where I lived within seconds of several good friends and many more acquaintances.
In August, the park behind the Sandy Hill Community Centre re-opened after two years of construction and remodeling. The park is lovely, with a wide, sunken expanse of grass, and a separate section full of climbing structures and wading pools and swing sets. And the best part, for us and many other community members, is that the park is designated as an off-leash space for dogs.
Immediately, I started taking our three dogs there at 5 PM when I finished work. The dogs loved running around with their fellow neighbourhood canines and I loved actually talking to people in my neighbourhood who were interesting. Some of the dog owners have lived here for over 20 years. Some, like me, have just moved recently. There are parents with children who bring both their dogs and their kids to the park. There are people who work from home and welcome the daily oppourtunity to come outside and chat with their neighbours. There are some big dogs, but most of them are little. The largest one, Robbie, is an energetic rottweiler who steals the tennis balls that my dogs like to play with. He wags his tail when I stick my hands in his mouth to take the balls back.
Early on in our time at the dog park, a group of us arrived at around 5 PM and, as usual, let our dogs off their leashes to run. A young mom with her one-year-old was sitting on the grass at one side of the park. I could see that she was looking uncomfortable as the park filled up with dogs, but I figured there were plenty of places for her to go and sit away from the animals, so I didn't worry about it. As I said, there is a separate children's area at the far end of the park, complete with benches for sitting and lots of space for kids to play.
Eventually, she got up from where she was sitting and started walking out of the park with her child in her arms. She had a medium sized inflatable ball with her which, instead of picking up and carrying with her, she started kicking ahead of her as she walked through the centre of the off-leash portion of the park. Perhaps you can see where this is going. One of the dogs, no doubt thinking this was yet another one of the many balls that get thrown around for the park dogs to play with, grabbed the ball and started to run with it. By the time the ball was retrieved, it had been punctured.
The woman with the child was livid. She demanded that that the dogs owners pay for the ball and said that she was going to call Councilor Bédard and have dogs banned from the park. Which, frankly, I think was a bit of an over-reaction.
That was the only incident of its kind that I was present for, but there have been at least three other instances of parents coming into the park to tell dog owners that they shouldn't have off-leash privileges because it makes things dangerous for children playing in the park.
Here's what I think:
-Dog owners and parents both have responsibilities. As a dog owner, I would not bring a dog to the park who I could not control, and I would not bring a dog to a park if that dog was likely to pursue and attack a child (or an adult for that matter!) because it's my responsibility to deal with my own animal. Most of the people who are bringing their dogs to the park for quality exercise and outdoor play, are responsible dog owners.
- I believe that parents need to teach their children how to deal with dogs safely (i.e. allow the dog to sniff their hand before petting the dog, don't run after the dog or scream at the dog, ask the owner if you can touch the dog etc) the same way they would teach their children how to be careful crossing the street. I don't know that banning dogs from the park is the automatic answer to some parents' concerns about what might happen to their children.
-The park is there for the good of the community. One group of people (parents) does not automatically gain priority over another group of people (dog owners). Especially because, to my knowledge, there have been no significant examples of dog owners misusing the park and recklessly endangering children.
-Dog owners use the park primarily between the hours of 4:30 and 6:30 PM. That's two hours, maximum, on most days. If people are concerned about off-leash dogs, why not suggest a compromise whereby the off-leash hours of the park are limited to those two hours? I don't think there are a lot of parents bringing their children to the park around the dinner hours anyway, it would probably not be a major loss for them.
-The park was designed and built with the aid of extensive community consultation. It was an off-leash park prior to being renovated, and it is still an off-leash park. This has already been discussed and resolved. Even in the
minutes from the Action Sandy Hill meeting on October 27, 2009, Councilor Bédard said that "any change in the park designation as a dog park would require community consultation." We are all part of the community, dog owners and parents alike. If a clear problem with the use of the park develops then I agree that a community consultation would be the only logical route.
J.
-